Abstract: This paper applies Speech Act Theory towards an investigation of the use and role of self-praise/positive self-assessment in the texts of three Chekhov’s plays: The Seagull, Three Sisters and The Cherry Orchard. The findings conducted with manual coding of texts for the speech acts of self-praise/positive self-assessment suggest that Chekhov employed self-praise for a number of textual and character-building functions. In particular, self-praise functions as a literary device to identify less likable characters as well as to provide a chance for more likable characters to stand up for themselves against injustice and provocation. The self-praise/positive self-assessment comes in mitigated and aggravated forms. Mitigation is mostly achieved through grammatical or phrasal means, as well as semantically through self-criticism, whereby the only form of aggravation observed in the data was other-criticism/other-derogation. Specific forms of a positive self-assessment likely unique to Chekhov’s plays are ‘linguistic brags’, i.e., contextually unjustifiable switches to French and Latin as well as ‘generational’ positive self-representation in Three Sisters. The results suggest that investigations of speeh acts in dramas could be productive for literary theory, as they shed more light on the characters development as well as the genre mastery of the playwright.
References
Baturina, E. G. “ʽTri sestry’: metafizichnost' chekhovskogo teksta” [“ʽThree Sisters’: Metaphysical Properties of Chekhov’s Text”]. Sobennikov, A. S., editor. Filosofiia Chekhova: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Chekhov’s Philosophy: Materials of an International Research Conference]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk university press Publ., 2008, pp. 4–11. (In Russ.)
Goriacheva, M. O. “Liubil li Chekhov teatr?” [“Did Chekhov love theatre?”]. Sobennikov, A. S., editor. Filosofiia Chekhova: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Chekhov’s Philosophy: Materials of an International Research Conference]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk university press Publ., 2008, pp. 34–43. (In Russ.)
Dement’ev, V. V. Teoriia rechevykh zhanrov [Theory of Speech Genres]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2010, 600 p. (In Russ.)
Diachkova, I. G. “Pokhvala i poritsanie kak rechevye zhanry” [“Praise and Disapproval as Speech Genres”]. Vestnik Omskogo Universiteta, vol. 3, 1998, pp. 5–58. (In Russ.)
Dimitrov, L. “ʽTri sestry’: Vo imia ottsa” [“ʽThree Sisters’: In the Name of the Father”]. Sobennikov, A. S., editor. Filosofiia Chekhova: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Chekhov’s Philosophy: Materials of an International Research Conference]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk university press Publ., 2008, pp. 60–68. (In Russ.)
Gabidullina, A. R. Uchebno-pedagogicheskii diskurs: kategorial’naia struktura i zhanrovoe svoeobrazie [Educational Discourse: Categorical Structure and Genre Idiosyncrasies: PhD thesis]. Donetsk, 2009. 206 p. (In Russ.)
Ivleva, T. G. Avtor v dramaturgii A. P. Chekhova [The author in A. P. Chekhov’s dramas]. Tver’, Tver’ State University Publ., 2001. 124 p. (In Russ.)
Kataev, V. B. Chekhov plius… [Chekhov plus…]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., 2004. 408 p. (In Russ.)
Komarov, S. A. “Liniia Lopakhin – Trofimov v komedii A. P. Chekhova ‘Vishnevyi sad’: filosofskie obertony” [“The Line Lopakhin – Trofimov in the Comedy ‘The Cherry Orchard’ by A. P. Chekhov: Philosophical Overtones”]. Sobennikov, A. S., editor. Filosofiia Chekhova: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Chekhov’s Philosophy: Materials of an International Research Conference]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk university press Publ., 2008, pp. 106–114. (In Russ.)
Krysin, L. P. Sovremennyi russkii iazyk: sistema, norma, uzus [The Contemporary Russian Language: System, Norm, and Use]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., 2010. 480 p. (In Russ.)
Peftiev, V. I. “A. P. Chekhov i ego sovremenniki v kontekste obshchestvennykh diskussii rubezha XIX–XX vv.” [“A. P. Chekhov and His Contemporaries in the Context of Public Discussions at the Turn of the 20th Century”]. Verkhnevolozhskii filologicheskii vestnik, vol. 4, no. 15, 2018, pp. 1–5. (In Russ.)
Stepanov, A. D. Problemy kommunikatsii u Chekhova [Chekhov's Communication Issues]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., 2005. 400 p. (In Russ.)
Asher, Nicholas and Lascarides, Alex. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 552 p. (In English)
Austin, John Langshaw. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1962. 166 p. (In English)
Bartlett, Rosamund. Chekhov: Scenes from a Life. London, Simon and Schuster, 2004. 401 p. (In English)
Benoit, William. L. and Benoit, Pamela J. “Aggravated and Mitigated opening utterances.ˮ Argumentation, no. 4 (2), 1990, pp. 171–183. (In English)
Dayter, Daria. “Self-praise in microblogging.ˮ Journal of Pragmatics, no. 61, 2014, pp. 91–102. (In English)
Dayter, Daria. “Self-praise online and offline.ˮ Internet Pragmatics, no. 1 (1), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00009.day (Accessed 28 March 2021). (In English)
De Pablos-Ortega, C. “ʽWould it be fair to say that you actively sought our material?’: Mitigation and aggravation in police investigation interviews.ˮ Pragmatics and Society, no. 10 (1), 2019, pp. 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00015.pab (In English)
Dominiczak, Marek H. “Physician writers: Anton Chekhov.ˮ Clinical Chemistry, no. 60 (4), 2014, pp. 703–704. (In English)
Gorman, David. “The use and abuse of speech-act theory in criticism.ˮ Poetics Today, no. 20 (1), 1999, pp. 93–119. (In English)
Kolyaseva, Alena F. “Text from a functional communicative perspective: a linguistic analysis of Chekhov’s humoresque ʽMy her’.” Text and Talk, no. 37 (5), 2017, pp. 639–662. (In English)
Matley, David “ʽThis is NOT a #humblebrag, this is just a #brag’: The pragmatics of self-praise, hashtags and politeness in Instagram posts.ˮ Discourse, Context & Media, no. 22, 2018, pp. 30–38. (In English)
Offord, Derek; Rjéoutski, Vladislav; Argent, Gesine. The French Language in Russia: A Social, Political, Cultural, and Literary History. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2018. 810 p. (In English)
Petrey, Sandy. Speech Acts and Literary Theory. London, Routledge, 2017. 186 p. (In English)
Salam El-Dakhs, Dina; A., Ambreen, Fatima; Zaheer, Maria and Gusarova Yulia. “A pragmatic analysis of the speech act of criticizing in university teacher-student talk. The case of English as a lingua franca.ˮ Pragmatics, no. 29 (4), 2019, pp. 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18028.eld (In English)
Shcherbenok, Andrey. “ʽKilling realism’: Insight and meaning in Anton Chekhov.ˮ The Slavic and East European Journal, no. 54 (2), 2010, pp. 297–316. (In English)
Searle, John R. Speech Acts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969. 203 p. (In English)
Searle, John R. “A taxonomy of illocutionary acts.ˮ Gunderson, К., editor. Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1975, pp. 344–369. (In English)
Weststeijn, Willem G. “On the Analysis of Literary Character. Jan van der Eng's Narrative Model as a Contribution to the Theory of Character.ˮ Russian Literature, no. 54 (1–3), 2003, pp. 415–429. (In English)
Whyman, Rose. Anton Chekhov. New York, Routledge, 2011. 200 p. (In English)
Wood, James. “The unwinding stair.ˮ New Republic, no. 228 (9) 2003. https://newrepublic.com/article/66783/the-unwinding-stair (Accessed 28 March 2021) (In English)
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. “A conversation analysis of self-praising in everyday Mandarin interactions.ˮ Journal of Pragmatics, no. 43, 2011, pp. 3152–3176. (In English)
