Download:

PDF

Keywords: F. M. Dostoevsky, literary theory, history, philosophy of history, Napoleonic myth, Napoleon, Schlosser, the role of personality in history.
For citation:

Podosokorsky, N. N. “History in the Life and Work of F. M. Dostoevsky.” Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 6, no. 3, 2024, pp. 98–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-3-98-125

Author: Nikolay N. Podosokorsky
Information about the author:

Nikolay N. Podosokorsky, PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher, A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6310-1579

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: May 10, 2024
Approved after reviewing: June 28, 2024
Published: September 25, 2024
Issue: 2024 Volume 6 No. 3
Department: Russian Literature of the 18th–19th Centuries
Pages: 98-125
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-3-98-125
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/BNOEOH

UDK: 821.161.1.09"19"

Abstract: The article is devoted to the role of history in the life and work of F. M. Dostoevsky. The writer studied world and Russian history throughout his life. The work notes what historical works Dostoevsky read and especially valued, and what books on history were in his home library. The article attempts to determine how Dostoevsky understood history, how he saw the role of the individual in history, and how he expressed it in his works. The writer’s first literary experiences in the early 1840s were already associated with an attempt to write essays on historical topics. And then, he defined many of his works by the genre as “chronicle” or “annals,” which allows them to be formally classified as “historical literature” in a broad sense. In Dostoevsky’s works, the characters not only enthusiastically study and teach history but also actively compose historical works of a scientific and artistic nature. The author of the article substantiates the idea that the writer and his characters’ appeal to history lies at the basis of Dostoevsky’s poetics and often creates a secondary plot in his works, giving the depicted scenes and characters additional historical and cultural volume.

 

References

Viktorovich, V. A. “Utrachennaia p’esa Dostoevskogo ʽMariia Stiuart’ (materialy k rekonstruktsii zamysla)” [“Dostoevsky’s Lost Play ʽMary Stuart’ (Materials for the Reconstruction of the Idea)”]. Neizvestnyi Dostoevskii, vol. 10, no. 4, 2023, pp. 55–101. https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2023.7021 (In Russ.)

Viktorovich, V. A. “Utrachennaia p’esa Dostoevskogo ʽBoris Godunov’ (istochniki, kontseptsiia)” [“Dostoevsky’s Lost Play ʽBoris Godunov’ (Sources, Concept)”]. Neizvestnyi Dostoevskii, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, pp. 5–43. https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2024.7121 (In Russ.)

Vilinbakhov, G. V. “K istorii odnoi nauchnoi dueli (disput M. P. Pogodina i

N. I. Kostomarova)” [“On the History of a Scientific Duel (Dispute Between M. P. Pogodin and N. I. Kostomarov)”]. Arkheograficheskii ezhegodnik, vol. 1, no. 1. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2013, pp. 162–179. (In Russ.)

Volkova, E. A. “Osveshchenieosnovnykhproblemrossiiskoiistoriivpublitsisticheskikh sochineniiakh F. M. Dostoevskogo” [“Coverage of the Main Problems of Russian History in the Journalistic Writings of F. M. Dostoevsky”]. Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2 (28), 2016, pp. 37–40. (In Russ.)

Gerasimenko, G. A. Istoriia rossiiskoi istoricheskoi nauki (dooktiabr’skii period) [The History of Russian Historical Science (Pre-October Period)]. Moscow, Rossiiskaia mezhdunarodnaia akademiia turizma Publ., 1998. 192 p. (In Russ.)

“Zapiski iz podpol’ia” F. M. Dostoevskogo v kul’ture Evropy i Ameriki [“Notes from the Underground” by F. M. Dostoevsky in the Culture of Europe and America]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2021. 1024 p. (In Russ.)

Ivanov, V. I. “Dostoevskii i roman-tragediia” [“Dostoevsky and the Tragedy Novel”]. Ivanov, V. I. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 t. [Collected Works: in 4 vols.], vol. 4, ed. by D. V. Ivanov and O. Deshart. Bruxelles, Foyer Oriental Chrétien Publ., 1987, pp. 399–436. (In Russ.)

Isupov, K. G. “Istoricheskoe poznanie v khudozhestvennom opyte F. M. Dostoevskogo” [“Historical Knowledge in the Artistic Experience of F. M. Dostoevsky”]. Isupov, K. G. Russkaia filosofskaia kul’tura [Russian Philosophical Culture]. St. Petersburg, Universitetskaia kniga Publ., 2010, pp. 114–143. (In Russ.)

Kaigorodov, V. I. “Ob istorizme Dostoevskogo” [“About Dostoevsky’s Historicism”]. Fridlender, G. M., editor. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia [F. M. Dostoevsky. Materials and Research], vol. 4. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1980, pp. 27–40. (In Russ.)

Kasatkina, T. A. “Kir Persidskii i ʽFiziologiia’ L’iuisa v ʽPrestuplenii i nakazanii’.” [“Cyrus of Persia and Lewes’ ‘Physiology’ in the Novel ʽCrime and Punishment’.”] Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 4 (24), 2023, pp. 93–128. https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-4-93-128 (In Russ.)

Kronin, V. Napoleon [Napoleon], trans. from English S. Strukov. Moscow, Zakharov Publ., 2008. 559 p. (In Russ.)

Liubiatinskaia, U. S. Istoricheskie vozzreniia F. M. Dostoevskogo: Po materialam “Dnevnika pisatelia” [The Historical Views of F. M. Dostoevsky: Based on the Materials of the “Diary of a Writer”: PhD Dissertation]. Moscow, 2006. 193 p. (In Russ.)

Maskevich, E. D., and B. N. Tikhomirov. “Iz iunykh let Mikhaila i Fedora Dostoevskikh (Novye arkhivnye materialy 1837–1839 gg.)” [“The Teen Years of Mikhail and Fedor Dostoevsky (New Archival Materials of 1837–1839)”]. Neizvestnyi Dostoevskii, 2019, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 56–93. https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2019.3981 (In Russ.)

Nechaeva, V. S. Zhurnal M. M. i F. M. Dostoevskikh “Vremia” 1861–1863 [The Magazine of M. M. and F. M. Dostoevsky “Time,” 1861–1863]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972. 317 p. (In Russ.)

Nechaeva, V. S. Zhurnal M. M. i F. M. Dostoevskikh “Epokha” 1864–1865 [The Magazine of M. M. and F. M. Dostoevsky “Epoch,” 1864–1865]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975. 303 p. (In Russ.)

Nechaeva, V. S. Rannii Dostoevskii, 1821–1849 [Early Dostoevsky, 1821–1849]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 288 p. (In Russ.)

Nisbet, R. Progress: istoriia idei [Progress: The History of the Idea], trans. from English by Iu. Kuznetsov and G. Sapov. Moscow, IRISEN Publ., 2007. 555 p. (In Russ.)

Otlivanchik, A. V. “Filosofsko-istoricheskaia doktrina N. Ia. Danilevskogo v vospriiatii F. M. Dostoevskogo: po dokumental’nym istochnikam” [“Philosophical and Historical Doctrine of N. Ya. Danilevsky in the Perception of F. M. Dostoevsky: On Documentary Sources”]. Dostoevskii: materialy i issledovaniia [Dostoevsky: Materials and Research], vol. 22, 2019, pp. 120–129. (In Russ.)

Podosokorskii, N. N. “Napoleonovskie voiny v ʽDiadiushkinom sne’ F. M. Dosto- evskogo” [“The Napoleonic Wars in F. M. Dostoevsky’s ʽUncle’s Dream’.”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 6, 2011, pp. 350–362. (In Russ.)

Podosokorskii, N. N. “Napoleon i 1812 god v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoevskogo” [“Napoleon and the Year 1812 in the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky”]. Shcherbakov, V. I., editor. 1812 god i mirovaia literatura [The Year 1812 in World Literature]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2013, pp. 319–364. (In Russ.)

Podosokorskii, N. N. “ʽNapoleonovskii’ Peterburg i ego otrazhenie v romane F. M. Dostoevskogo ʽPrestuplenie i nakazanie’.” [“ʽNapoleonic’ Petersburg and Its Reflec- tion in F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel ʽCrime and Punishment’.”] Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 4 (20), 2022, pp. 71–135. https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311- 2022-4-71-135 (In Russ.)

Podosokorskii, N. N. “Lakei Smerdiakov kak pochitatel’ Napoleona v romane F. M. Dostoevskogo ʽBrat’ia Karamazovy’.” [“Lackey Smerdyakov as an Admirer of Napoleon in F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel ʽThe Brothers Karamazov’.”] Novyi mir, no. 1 (1185), 2024, pp. 172–183. (In Russ.)

Savel’eva, I. M., Poletaev, A. V. Teoriia istoricheskogo znaniia [Theory of Historical Knowledge]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia, Istoricheskaia kniga Publ., 2007. 523 p. (In Russ.)

Saraskina, L. I. Dostoevskii [Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Publ., 2011. 825 p. (In Russ.)

Sedel’nikova, O. V., E. A. Golovacheva, and O. P. Oleinik. “ʽRasskazy iz russkoi istorii” A. N. Maikova: ot idei k realizatsii” [“Apollon Maykov’s ʽTales from Russian History’: from Idea to Implementation”]. Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 1 (25), 2024, pp. 198–221. https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-1-198-221 (In Russ.)

Smirnova, E. L. “Dostoevskii i antichnost’: klassicheskoe obrazovanie v pan- sione L. I. Chermaka” [“Dostoevsky and Antiquity: Classical Education at the L. I. Chermak Boarding School”]. Neizvestnyi Dostoevskii, vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, pp. 5–33.https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2021.5441 (In Russ.)

Stepanian, K. A. “Soznat’ i skazat’”: “Realizm v vysshem smysle” kak tvorcheskii metod F. M. Dostoevskogo [“To Know and Say”: “Realism in the Highest Sense” as F. M. Dostoevsky’s Creative Method]. Moscow, Raritet Publ., 2005. 512 p. (In Russ.)

Uait, Kh. Metaistoriia: Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka [Metahistory: Historical Imagination in 19th Century Europe], trans. from English, ed. by E. G. Trubina, V. V. Kharitonov. Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Kabinetnyi uchenyi Publ., 2023. 528 p. (In Russ.)

Faleichik, V. L. Istoricheskie vzgliady G. G. Gervinusa [Historical views of G. G. Gervinus: PhD Thesis, Summary]. Penza, 2007. 24 p. (In Russ.)

Fedorov, G. A. “Pansion L. I. Chermaka v 1834–1837 gg. (po novym materialam)” [“Boarding House of L. I. Chermak in 1834–1837 (Based on New Materials)”]. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia [Dostoevsky. Materials and Research], vol. 1. ed. By G. M. Fridlender. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1974, pp. 241–254. (In Russ.)

Cherepnin, L. V. Istoricheskie vzgliady klassikov russkoi literatury [Historical Views of the Classics of Russian Literature]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1968. 383 p. (In Russ.)

Shteinberg, A. Dnevniki (1909–1971). F. M. Dostoevskii [Diaries (1909–1971).

F. M. Dostoevsky], comp., text prep. and comm. by N. Portnova. Moscow, Modest Kolerov Publ., 2017. 384 p. (In Russ.)