Download:

PDF

Keywords: L. N. Tolstoy, M. N. Katkov, correspondence, correspondents, editorial policy, “Russian Bulletin,” public, readership.
For citation:

Andreeva, V. G. “ʽKatkov... Is Just Right for the Public’: Correspondence Between L. N. Tolstoy and M. N. Katkov in the 1850s–1860s.” Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 6, no. 2, 2024, pp. 20–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-2-20-39

Author: Valeria G. Andreeva
Information about the author:

Valeria G. Andreeva, DSc in Philology, Leading Research Fellow, A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-3153

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: March 14, 2024
Approved after reviewing: April 22, 2024
Published: June 25, 2024
Issue: 2024 Volume 6 No. 2
Department: Russian Literature of the 18th–19th Centuries
Pages: 20–39
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-2-20-39
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/POKWSV

UDK: 821.161.1.09"19"

Acknowledgments: This work was carried out at IWL RAS with financial support from the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 23-28-00661 “Correspondence of L. N. Tolstoy with Russian Writers and Publicists. 1860s” (https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-00661/).

Abstract: The article analyzes the correspondence between L. N. Tolstoy and M. N. Katkov, which has not yet been studied and commented on in detail in science. The author of the article consistently presents the history of interaction between correspondents, reveals the context of the correspondence, and shows the difficulties that arose during communication and their reasons. There is a difference in the worldview andcharacters of the writer andthe publisher; however, several factors particularly attracted Tolstoy to Katkov and his publications in the late 1850s and early 1860s. The article states a certain conditional dependence of the writer on the editor and comprehends the possible influence of Katkov’s newspaper and journal on Tolstoy in different periods. For Tolstoy, Katkov, throughout the entire period of their communication, continued to remain the most public person, a leader and at the same time serving the public, but Tolstoy needed his work and capabilities precisely to communicate with a wide audience. 

 

References

Andreeva ,V. G. O natsional’nom svoeobrazii russkogo romana vtoroi poloviny XIX v. [On the National Originality of the Russian Novel of the Second Half of the State University Publ., 2016. 492 p. (In Russ.)

Andreeva, V. G. “ʽChelovek sozdan byt’ oporoi drugomu, potomu chto emu samomu nuzhna opora’: perepiska L. N. Tolstogo  i N. A. Nekrasova” [“ʽMan Is Created to Be a Support for Another, Because He Himself Needs Support”: Correspondence Between L. N. Tolstoy and N. A. Nekrasov”]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaia i zarubezhnaia filologiia, vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, pp. 74–83. https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2023-3-74-83 (In Russ.)

Babaev, E. G. Lev Tolstoi i zhurnalistika ego epokhi [Leo Tolstoy and the Journalism of His Era]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1978. 294 p. (In Russ.)

Gorodilova, N. I. “Roman ʽAnna Karenina’ v otsenke ʽRusskogo vestnika’.” [“The Novel ʽAnna Karenina’ in the Assessment of ʽRussian Messenger’.”] Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka, vol. 81, no. 1, 2022, pp. 82–89. https://doi.org/10.31857/S160578800018921-9 (In Russ.)

Gusev, N. N. Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoi: Materialy k biografii s 1855 po 1869 god [Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy: Materials for a Biography from 1855 to 1869]. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union Publ., 1957. 915 p. (In Russ.)

Zhirkov, G. V. “L. N. Tolstoi i ego izdateli: osobennosti vzaimodeistviia avtora i predprinimatelia” [“L. N. Tolstoy and His Publishers: Features of Interaction Between the Author and the Entrepreneur”]. Materialy nauchnykh sessii 2019 goda v Gosudarstvennom muzee L. N. Tolstogo [Materials of Scientific Sessions of 2019 at the State Museum of L. N. Tolstoy]. Moscow, RG-Press Publ., 2020, pp. 274–291. (In Russ.)

Perevalova, E. V. “ʽNe vsiakomu viden trud redaktora…’: Retsenziia na novuiu knigu o M. N. Katkove” [“ʽNot Everyone Can See the Work of an Editor...”: Review of a New Book About M. N. Katkov”]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 6, no. 1, 2024, pp. 232–253. https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-1-232-253 (In Russ.)

Sun, Ts. “Gazetnye soobshcheniia o pol’skom  vosstanii 1863 g. v vospriia- tii L. N. Tolstogo” [“Newspaper Reports About the Polish Uprising of 1863 in the Perception of L. N. Tolstoy”]. Litera, no. 1, 2024, pp. 277–286. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2024.1.69117 (In Russ.)

Fusso, S. Katkov. Izdatel’ Turgeneva, Dostoevskogo i Tolstogo [Publisher of Turgenev, Dostoevsky and Tolstoy], trans. from English by V. Polishchuk. St. Petersburg, Academic Studies Press, Bibliorossika Publ., 2023. 436 p. (In Russ.)

Chernova, M. S. “U istokov politicheskoi zhurnalistiki: M. N. Katkov o ʽpol’skom voprose’.” [“At the Origins of Political Journalism: M. N. Katkov on the ʽPolish Question’.”] Mediaissledovaniia, no. 9, 2022, pp. 175–180. (In Russ.)

Heraclides, Alexis, and Ada Dialla. “The Balkan Crisis of 1875–78 and Russia: Between Humanitarianism and Pragmatism” [“The Balkan Crisis of 1875–78 and Russia: Between Humanitarianism and Pragmatism”]. Humanitarian Intervention in the Long Nineteenth Century: Setting the Precedent. Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2015, pp. 169–196. (In English)

Pyziur, Eugene. “Mikhail N. Katkov: Advocate of English Liberalism in Russia, 1856– 1863” [“Mikhail N. Katkov: Advocate of English Liberalism in Russia, 1856–1863”]. The Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 45, no. 105, 1967, pp. 439–456. (In English)