Acknowledgments: The study was supported by National Social Science Foundation of China, Project no. 20AAWW004.
Abstract: Herzen is always presented primarily as a revolutionary aristocrat and admirer of Western Europe. However, Herzen quickly became disillusioned with the prospects for the development of European civilization, and this was understood and felt by some of his astute contemporaries. Literary critic N. N. Strakhov wrote a voluminous article “Herzen”, in which he proved that Herzen went from a desperate nihilist to an adherent of Russian cultural traditions. The author examines Strakhov’s article, analyzes the course of his reflections, dwells on the philosophical and worldview features in the works of Herzen, which the critic highlights. The article shows that Strakhov defines Herzen as the first literary man who began the struggle against the West. According to the author of the article, this statement is not only a typical case of anti-Westernism by the nationalist Strakhov, but also the starting point of self-reflection in Russian culture in the second half of the 19th century. The article also discusses in detail the impact of Strakhov’s article on criticism and academic science.
References
Antonova, G. N. Gertsen i russkaia kritika 50-60-kh godov 19 veka. Problemy khudozhestvenno-filosofskoi prozy [Herzen and Russian Criticism of the 1850–1860s. Fiction and Philosophical Prose Issues]. Saratov, Saratov State University Publ., 1989. 198 p. (In Russ.)
Gillel’son, M. I., Dryzhakova, E. N., Perkal’, M. K. A. I. Gertsen [A. I. Herzen]. Moscow, Leningrad, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1965. 340 p. (In Russ.)
Dolinin, A. S. Poslednie romany Dostoevskogo [The Last Novels of Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Leningrad, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1963. 344 p. (In Russ.)
Kantor, V. K. “Tragicheskie geroi Dostoevskogo v kontekste russkoi sud’by (Roman ‘Podrostok’)” [“Dostoevsky’s Tragic Heroes in the Context of Russian Destiny (Novel Teenager)”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 6, 2008, pp. 119–151. (In Russ.)
Luk’ianov, S. M. “Zapis’ besed s E. E. Ukhtomskim” [“Recording of Conversations with E.E. Ukhtomsky”]. Rossiiskii Arkhiv [Russian Archives] issue II–III. Moscow, Studiia TRITE, Ros. arkhiv Publ., 1992, pp. 393–402. (In Russ.)
Klimova S. M., editor. N. N. Strakhov v dialogakh s sovremennikami. Filosofiia kak kul’tura ponimaniia [N. N. Strakhov in Dialogues with Contemporaries. Philosophy as a Culture of Understanding]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ, 2010. 207 p. (In Russ.)
Pekar’, M. K. “Otkliki russkoi pechati na smerti A. I. Gertsena” [“Responses of the Russian Press on the Death of A. I. Herzen”]. Obshchestvennaia mysl’ v Rossii XIX v. [“Social Thought in Russia in the 19th Century”]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1986, pp. 108–126. (In Russ.)
Tunimanov, V. A. “‘Vol’noe slovo’ A. I. Gertsena i russkaia literaturnaia mysl’ XIX veka”. [“‘Free Speech’ of A. I. Herzen and Russian Literary Thought of the 19th Century”]. Russkaia literatura, no. 1, 1987, pp. 100–112. (In Russ.)
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Faust. Berlin, Weimar, Aufbau-Verl., 1986. 783 p. (In German)
Jiangang Zhu. “Life Consciousness and National Foundation: A Brief Discussion on Strahov’s Interpretation of Tolstoy.” Foreign Literature Review, no. 1, 2014, pp. 143–155. (In Chinese)
Gerstein, Linda. Nikolai Strakhov. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971. 233 p. (In English)
Shklovsky, V. Tolstoy. Trans. An Guoliang and others. Zhengzhou, Swollow publishing house, 2005. 795 p. (In Chinese) Wright, Anthony Colin. Mikhail Bulgakov: Life a. interpretations. Toronto etc.: University of Toronto press, Cop. 1978. 324 p. (In English)
