Download:

PDF

Keywords: N. V. Gogol, V. F. Odoevsky, Portrait, Opere del cavaliere Giambattista Piranesi, creative dialogue, aesthetics, ethics, axiology.
For citation:

Sytina, Yu. N. “N. V. Gogol’s Portrait and V. F. Odoevsky’s Opera by Cavalier Giambattista Piranesi: Ethics, Aesthetics, Poetics.” Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 7, no. 1, 2025, pp. 162–181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-1-162-181

Author: Yuliya N. Sytina
Information about the author:

Yuliya N. Sytina, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, State University of Education, Friedrich Engels St., 21 a, 105005 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6334-4722
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: July 11, 2024
Approved after reviewing: September 19, 2024
Published: March 25, 2025
Issue: 2025 Volume 7 No. 1
Department: Russian Literature of the 18th–19th Centuries
Pages: 162-181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-1-162-181
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/WRANHO

UDK: 821.161.1.09"19"
Publication Type: Research Article

Abstract: The article analyzes Opere del cavaliere Giambattista Piranesi by V. F. Odoevsky and Portrait by N. V. Gogol. Changes in the editions of the stories and roll calls in the texts are discussed in detail. The article reveals both the similarity of images and motifs, ethical and aesthetic views of Gogol and Odoevsky, as well as the difference in the outlook and manner of the writers. The central idea in both works is the responsibility of the artist for the God — given talent. Improper treatment leads to disastrous consequences. The common features of the works are: the mystical intensity of the narrative; the motifs of earthly immortality and madness; the absence of a love conflict; and in the first editions, the place of the beginning of the action is small St. Petersburg shops. The ethical views of writers are developing in a similar direction. Gogol and Odoevsky are becoming more demanding of themselves, the word and the artists. The aesthetics of their works in the second editions differ more than in the first. Gogol refuses to personify Fantasy, describes in more detail the everyday realities of Russian life. Odoevsky takes the action to Italy and enhances the mystical flair. At the same time, both writers remain alien to the principles of the “natural” school: art, in their opinion, should not copy, but transform life.

 

References

Bocharov, S. G., and L. B Deriugina. “Kommentarii” [“Notes”]. Gogol’, N. V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 23 t. [Complete Works and Letters: in 23 vols.], vol. 3. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009, pp. 461–984. (In Russ.)

Vinogradov, I. A. “ʽArabeski’ N. V. Gogolia: edinstvo kompozitsii i problematiki tsikla” [“The ʽArabesques’ Cycle by N. V. Gogol: Unity of Composition and Problems”]. Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki, vol. 19, no. 4, 2021, pp. 234–304. https://doi.org/10.15393/ j9.art.2021.1026 (In Russ.)

Vinogradov, I. A. “Letopis’ zhizni i tvorchestva N. V. Gogolia (1809–1852): v 7 t.” [“Chronicle of N. V. Gogol’s Life and Work (1809–1852): in 7 vols.”], vol. 2: (1829–1836) [(1829–1836)]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2017. 672 p. (In Russ.)

Komarovich, V. L. “Zapiski sumasshedshego. Kommentarii” [“Notes of a Madman. Notes”]. Gogol’, N. V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 14 t. [Complete Works and Letters: in 23 vols.], vol. 3. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union Publ., 1937–1952, pp. 697–705. (In Russ.)

Markovich, V. M. Peterburgskie povesti N. V. Gogolia [The Petersburg Stories of N. V. Gogol]. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1989. 208 p. (In Russ.)

Stepanov, N. L. “Nos. Kommentarii” [“Nose. Comments”]. Gogol’, N. V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 14 t. [Complete Works and Letters: in 14 vols.], vol. 3. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union Publ., 1937–1952, pp. 649–660. (In Russ.)

Sakulin, P. N. Iz istorii russkogo idealizma. Kn. V. F. Odoevskii. Myslitel’. Pisatel’ [From the History of Russian Idealism. Prince V. F. Odoevsky. Thinker. Writer], vol. 1, part 2. Мoscow, Izdatel’stvo M. i S. Sabashnikovykh Publ., 1913. 480 p. (In Russ.)

Sytina, Iu. N. “ʽIstina ne peredaetsia!’: vyrazhenie, ponimanie i dialog v romane V. F. Odoevskogo ʽRusskie nochi’.” [“ʽThe Truth Is Not Transmitted!’: Expression, Understanding and Dialogue in V. F. Odoevsky’s Novel ʽRussian Nights’.”] Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki, vol. 22, no. 1, 2024, pp. 96–118. https://doi.org/10.15393/ j9.art.2024.13464 (In Russ.)

Sytina, Iu. N. “V poiskakh ʽpolozhitel’no prekrasnogo’ geroia: kniaz’ Myshkin F. M. Dostoevskogo i Segeliel’ V. F. Odoevskogo” [“In Search of a ʽPositively Excellent’ Hero: Prince Myshkin by F. M. Dostoevsky and Segeliel by V. F. Odoevsky”]. Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki, vol. 19, no. 1, 2021, pp. 173–193. https://doi.org/10.15393/ j9.art.2021.8862 (In Russ.)

Sytina, Iu. N. Tvorchestvo V. F. Odoevskogo v bol’shom vremeni russkoi kul’tury [The Works of V. F. Odoevsky in the Great Time of Russian Culture]. St. Petersburg, Russian Christian Academy for Humanities Publ., 2022. 336 p. (In Russ.)

Tur’ian, M. A. “Strannaia moia sud’ba”: o zhizni V. F. Odoevskogo [“What a Strange Destiny I Have”: About Life of V. F. Odoevsky]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1991. 400 p. (In Russ.) Tur’ian, M. A. “Vladimir Odoevskii i Lermontov: k istokam religioznykh sporov” [“Vladimir Odoevsky and Lermontov: to the Origins of Religious Disputes”]. Sbornik statei k 60-letiyu V. Vatsuro. “Im Werden Verlag”: nekommercheskoe elektronnoe izdanie [Collection of Articles for the 60th Anniversary of V. Vatsuro. “Im Werden Verlag”: Non-Commercial Electronic Publication]. Munich, [S. n.], 2006, pp. 1–13. (In Russ.)

Iukhnova, I. S. “ʽChuzhaia’ rukopis’ v strukture khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniia (A. S. Pushkin, A. Pogorel’skii, A. F. Vel’tman)” [“ʽAlien’ Manuscript in Structure of Artistic Work (А. S. Pushkin, А. Pogorelskiy, А. F. Veltman)”]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriia: Filologiia, no. 2 (2), 2014, pp. 352–356. (In Russ.)