JATS XML:

XML

BibTEX:

BIB

Research Information Systems Citation Format:

RIS

Download:

PDF

For citation:

Afanasyeva, N. S. “Zoilus Versus Rifmokrad: About Literary Relations Between I. A. Krylov and Ya. B. Knyazhnin.” Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 6, no. 4, 2024, pp. 22–37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-4-22-37

Keywords: Russian literature of the 18th century, I. A. Krylov, Ya. B. Knyazhnin, N. P. Nikolev, literary argument, satirical comedy, moralistic journal.
Author: Natalya S. Afanasyeva
Information about the author:

Natalya S. Afanasyeva, PhD Applicant, Faculty of Philology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, bld. 51, 119991 Moscow, Russia; Lecturer, Faculty of Philology, Kazakhstan Branch of Moscow State University, Kazhymukan St., 11, 010010 Astana, Kazakhstan,

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2838-5149

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: August 11, 2024
Approved after reviewing: September 29, 2024
Published: December 25, 2024
Issue: 2024 Volume 6 No. 4
Department: Russian Literature of the 18th–19th Centuries
Pages: 22–37
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-4-22-37
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/FXWTWC

UDK: 821.161.1.09"19"
Publication Type: Research Article

Abstract: The article examines the “literary behavior” of I. A. Krylov in relation to the famous playwright Ya. B. Knyazhnin and the image of a mediocre plagiarist Rifmokrad (Rhyme Thief) in the comedy “Pranksters” (1788). This character, who surprisingly closely resembled Knyazhnin, later appeared in Krylov’s “Mail of Spirits” (1789) and then in the “Spectator” journal, which was published after Knyazhnin’s death. On the one hand, Krylov’s attitude towards Knyazhnin directly reflects the confrontation between two literary circles that arose within the Sumarokov school, i. e., between Knyazhnin and Nikolev. It is not by chance that Krylov chooses Nikolev’s comedy “The Proud Poet” (1775) as a model for his “Pranksters.” On the other hand, Krylov also makes a literary attack against Knyazhnin in his journals, which continue the tradition of moralistic journals in the spirit of N. I. Novikov.

 

References

Gabel’, M. O. “Literaturnoe nasledstvo Ia. B. Kniazhnina” [“Literary Heritage by Ya. B. Knyazhnin”]. Literaturnoe nasledstvo [Literary Heritage], vol. 9–10. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union Publ., 1933, pp. 359–368. (In Russ.)

Gordin, M. A., and Ia. A. Gordin. Teatr Ivana Krylova [Theater of Ivan Krylov].

Leningrad, Iskusstvo Publ., 1983. 176 p. (In Russ.)

Gukovskii, G. A. “Zametki o Krylove. Krylov i Kniazhnin” [“Notes About Krylov. Krylov and Knyazhnin”]. XVIII vek [The 18th Сentury], issue 2. Moscow, Leningrad, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union Publ., 1940, pp. 142–165 (In Russ.)

Ivinskii, D. P. “Ivan Andreevich Krylov” [“Ivan Andreevich Krylov”]. Krylov, I. A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 3 t. [Collected Works: in 3 vols.], vol. 1. Moscow, DAR” Publ., 2014, pp. 3–27. (In Russ.)

Kiseleva, L. N. “Zagadki dramaturgii Krylova” [“Riddles of Krylov’s Drama”]. Krylov, I. A. Polnoe sobranie dramaticheskikh sochinenii [Complete Dramatic Works]. St. Petersburg, Giperion Publ., 2001, pp. 3–35. (In Russ.)

Korovin, V. I. Zhizn’ i literaturnaia sud’ba Ivana Krylova [Life and Literary Destiny of Ivan Krylov]. Moscow, Litfakt Publ., 2024. 672 p. (In Russ.)

Kulakova, L. I. Iakov Borisovich Kniazhnin: 1742–1791 [Yakov Borisovich Knyazhnin: 1742–1791]. Moscow, Leningrad, Iskusstvo Publ., 1951. 91 p. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva, O. B. Istoriia russkoi literatury XVIII veka [History of the 18th-Сentury Russian Literature]. Moscow, Vysshaia shkola Publ., 2003, pp. 309–327. (In Russ.)

Maikov, L. N. Istoriko-literaturnye ocherki: Krylov. Zhukovskii. Batiushkov. Pushkin. Pletnev [Historical and Literary Essays: Krylov. Zhukovsky. Batyushkov. Pushkin. Pletnev]. St. Petersburg, L. F. Panteleev Publ., 1895. 311 p. (In Russ.)

Mogilianskii, A. P. “ʽOl’ga’, tragediia Ia. B. Kniazhnina” [“ʽOlga,’ Tragedy by Ya. B. Knyazhnin”]. XVIII vek [The 18th Century], issue 3. Moscow, Leningrad, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union Publ., 1958, pp. 498–504. (In Russ.).

Nikolaev, S. I. “ʽZoil v rossiiskikh gradekh’ (Ot Simeona Polotskogo do

A. D. Kantemira)” [“ʽZoilus in Russian Cities’ (From Simeon Polotskiy to A. D. Kantemir). XVIII vek [The 18th Century], issue 17. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 17–27. (In Russ.)

Nikolaev, S. I. “Original’nost’, podrazhanie i plagiat v predstavleniiakh russkikh pisatelei XVIII veka (Ocherk problematiki)” [“Originality, Imitation and Plagiarism

in the Ideas of Russian Writers of the 18th Century (Essay on the Issues)”]. XVIII vek

[The 18th Century], issue 23. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004, pp. 3–19. (In Russ.) Stennik, Iu. V. “Rol’ komedii v polemike 1750–1760-kh godov” [“The Role of

Comedy in the Polemics of the 1750s and 1760s”]. XVIII vek [The 18th Century], issue 17. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 28–47. (In Russ.)

Stepanov, V. P. “K istorii literaturnykh polemik XVIII v. (ʽObed Midasov’)” [“On the History of Literary Polemics of the 18th Century (ʽMidas’ Dinner’)”]. Ezhegodnik rukopisnogo otdela Pushkinskogo doma na 1976 god [Yearbook of the Manuscript Department of the Pushkin House for 1976]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1978, pp. 131–146. (In Russ.)