<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Two centuries of the Russian classics</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Two centuries of the Russian classics</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2686-7494</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2026-8-3-6-27</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The 1755 Lisbon Earthquake and Its Philosophical Interpretation in Western and Russian Literature of the 18th Century</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western" xml:lang="en">
            <surname>Krasheninnikova</surname>
            <given-names>Olga A.</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>red@rusklassika.ru</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-09-25" publication-format="electronic">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </pub-date>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>6</fpage>
      <lpage>27</lpage>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Lisbon earthquake</kwd>
        <kwd>poem</kwd>
        <kwd>Voltaire</kwd>
        <kwd>“On the Destruction of Lisbon</kwd>
        <kwd>” J.-J. Rousseau</kwd>
        <kwd>“Letter on Providence</kwd>
        <kwd>” G. Malagrida</kwd>
        <kwd>Gideon Krinovsky</kwd>
        <kwd>V. A. Levshin</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>The article examines the cultural significance of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. This event in 18th-century Europe spurred the study of seismic phenomena and the emergence of seismology as a science, and gave rise to a considerable number of philosophical and theological interpretations of this natural disaster. The Lisbon earthquake has featured prominently in Western philosophical thought (Voltaire’s “Poem on the Destruction of Lisbon,” 1756 and Rousseau’s “Letter on Providence,” 1756), sparking debates on the philosophy of optimism, Leibniz’s theodicy, and the origin of evil. Less well known is the contribution of 18th-century Russian theological thought, represented by the famous Elizabethan preacher Gideon Krinovsky (1726– 1763) and the writer V. A. Levshin (1746–1826), who offered their own original perspectives on the causes of the disaster. The Russian concept of the catastrophe that had occurred was not scientific, but purely theological: the cause of evil in the world was recognized as man’s sinful deviation from God’s commandments, and the natural disaster itself was intended to serve as a lesson in the need for repentance.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Artem’eva, T. V. “Vol’ter i problema teoditsei v russkoi filosofii XVIII veka” [“Voltaire and the Problem of Theodicy in Russian Philosophy of the 18th Century]. Vol’ter i Rossiia [Voltaire and Russia], ed. by A. D. Mikhailov and A. F. Stroev. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 1999, pp. 43–51. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Vol’ter v Rossii. Bibliograficheskii ukazatel’ 1735–1995. Russkie pisateli o Vol’tere. Stikhotvoreniia, stat’i, pis’ma, vospominaniia [Voltaire in Russia. A Bibliographic Index 1735–1995. Russian Writers on Voltaire. Poems, Articles, Letters, Memoirs]. Moscow, Rudomino Publ., 1995. 388 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Gusiakov, V. K. “Potriasenie Evropy” [“Shock of Europe”]. Nauka iz pervykh ruk, no. 5–6 (93), 2021, pp. 104–121. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Evgenii (Bolkhovitinov), mitr. “Gedeon Krinovskii” [“Gideon Krinovsky”]. Slovar’ istoricheskii o byvshikh v Rossii pisateliakh dukhovnogo china Greko-Rossiiskoi Tserkvi [A Historical Dictionary of Writers of the Spiritual Rank of the Greek-Russian Church Who Were in Russia]. Moscow, Sergiev Posad, Palomnik Publ., 1995, pp. 61–62. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Krasheninnikova, O. A. “Tserkovnaia propoved’ na Novyi god: evoliutsiia zhanra v pervoi polovine XVIII v.” [“Church Sermon for the New Year: The Evolution of the Genre in the First Half of the 18th Century]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 7, no. 4, 2025, pp. 6–23. https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-4-6-23 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Nikolaev, S. N. “Krinovskii Grigorii Andreevich” [“Krinovsky Grigory Andreevich”]. Slovar’ russkikh pisatelei XVIII veka [Dictionary of Russian Writers of the 18th Century], issue 2: (K–P). St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1999. pp. 151–152. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rusinova, O., and I. Utekhin. “Predislovie” [“Preface”]. Tavaresh, R. Nebol’shaia kniga o velikom zemletriasenii [A Small Book about the Great Earthquake], trans. from Portuguese E. Golubeva. St. Petersburg, European University in St. Petersburg Publ., 2009, pp. 7–10. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sergienko, A. Iu. “(Ne)vozmozhnost’ teoditsei: vliianie Lissabonskogo zemletriaseniia na filosofsko-antropologicheskie predstavleniia epokhi Prosveshcheniia” [“The (Im)possibility of Theodicy: The Influence of the Lisbon Earthquake on the Philosophical and Anthropological Ideas of the Enlightenment”]. Filosofskaia mysl’, no. 5, 2025, pp. 14–38. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Tavaresh, R. Nebol’shaia kniga o velikom zemletriasenii [A Small Book about the Great Earthquake], trans. from Portuguese E. Golubeva. St. Petersburg, European University in St. Petersburg Publ., 2009. 240 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sherikh, D. Iu. Istoriia gazety “Sankt-Peterburgskie vedomosti” ot Petra do Putina [The History of the Newspaper “St. Petersburg Vedomosti” from Peter to Putin]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskie vedomosti Publ., 2019. 268 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
