<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Two centuries of the Russian classics</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Two centuries of the Russian classics</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2686-7494</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2026-8-2-320-341</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>L. N. Tolstoy and the Agrarian Question in Russia at the Beginning of the 20th Century</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western" xml:lang="en">
            <surname>Khristenko</surname>
            <given-names>Dmitrii N.</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>red@rusklassika.ru</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-25" publication-format="electronic">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </pub-date>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>320</fpage>
      <lpage>341</lpage>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>L. N. Tolstoy</kwd>
        <kwd>P. A. Stolypin</kwd>
        <kwd>agrarian question</kwd>
        <kwd>land ownership</kwd>
        <kwd>peasants</kwd>
        <kwd>elections</kwd>
        <kwd>State Duma</kwd>
        <kwd>Henry George</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>The aim of this work is to examine Tolstoy’s views on land ownership in his dialogue with the authorities, particularly with P. A. Stolypin. Tolstoy’s literary works, journalistic appeals, and clear moral position reveal his understanding of Stolypin’s actions as aimed at maintaining the institutional authority of state power. The work’s novelty lies in its careful consideration of certain historical facts that literary scholars have overlooked when analyzing Tolstoy’s appeals and his dispute with Stolypin, and in its understanding of the role of the Russian classic and the power of his voice, which Russian historians underestimate. The author demonstrates Tolstoy’s activity as an “advocate” for the Russian agricultural people: the writer considered private land ownership unacceptable. The article analyzes Tolstoy’s letters to Stolypin, the minister’s views on the theoretical peasant farmer, and his conservative political stance, which clashed with the peasants’ views, as vividly demonstrated by the elections to the First and Second State Dumas and the ensuing political struggle. The article emphasizes that Tolstoy did not seek controversy, but rather sought to point out to Stolypin the need for an end to the escalation of the internal conflict.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Andreeva, V. G. “L. N. Tolstoi ob usad’be XX v.: ot ʽtsivilizatsii mashin’ k  novomu  prirodnomu  domu  vostochnogo  tipa”  [“L.  N.  Tolstoy  on  the 20th-Century Estate: From the ʽCivilization of Machines’ to a New Natural House of the Eastern Type”]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 7, no. 3, 2025, pp. 298–327. https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-3-298-327 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Andreeva, V. G. “Obraz zemli kak odna iz epicheskikh osnov khudozhestvennykh mirov romanov L. N. Tolstogo” [“The Image of the Earth as One of the Epic Foundations of the Artistic Worlds of L. N. Tolstoy’s Novels”]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 2, no. 2, 2020, pp. 192–227. https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2020-2-2-192-227 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zhuravlev, V. V. “Pervaia Gosudarstvennaia duma: ʽzvezdnyi chas rossiiskogo liberalizma’, dlitel’nostiu v 72 dnia” [“The First State Duma: ʽRussian Liberalism’s Finest Hour’, Lasting 72 Days”]. Rossiiskii liberalizm i Gosudarstvennaia Duma. 1906–1917 gg. [Russian Liberalism and the State Duma. 1906–1917], part 1. Orel. Izdatel’skii dom “ORLIK” Publ., 2019, pp. 26–58. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lebedev, Iu. V. “Istoricheskie sudby krest’ianskoi obshchiny” [“Historical Fates of the Peasant Community”]. Lebedev, Iu. V. “O slovo russkoe, rodnoe!” Stranitsy istorii otechestvennoi literatury [“O Russian Word, My Native!” Pages from the History of Russian Literature]. Kostroma, Kostroma State University Publ., 2014, pp. 382–425. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kocheshkov, G. N. “Fevralskaia revoliutsiia i agrarnyi vopros v Rossii: neudavshiisia liberalnyi proekt” [“The February Revolution and the Agrarian Question in Russia: A Failed Liberal Project”]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova, vol. 21, no. 2, 2015, pp. 30–36. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Novikova, N. V. “L. N. Tolstoi i P. A. Stolypin: vopros o zemle (istoricheskoe protivostoianie pisatelia i politika)” [“L. N. Tolstoy and P. A. Stolypin: The Land Question (The Historical Confrontation Between Writer and Politician)”]. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaia seriia. Seriia: Filologiia. Zhurnalistika, vol. 22, no, 2, 2022, pp. 223–231. https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2022-22-2-223-231 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Poliubina, I. B. “Agrarnyi vopros v ekonomicheskoi nauke Rossii nachala XX veka” [“The Agrarian Question in Russian Economic Science at the Beginning of the 20th Century”]. Finansy i kredit, no. 15 (105), 2002, pp. 80–91. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rumiantseva, E. E. “Diskussiia o zemle: L. N. Tolstoi, T. M. Bondarev i P. A. Stolypin” [“Discussion of Land: L. N. Tolstoy, T. M. Bondarev, and P. A. Stolypin”]. Materialy tolstovskikh chtenii 2020 goda v Gosudarstvennom muzee L. N. Tolstogo [Proceedings of the 2020 Tolstoy Readings at the L. N. Tolstoy State Museum]. Moscow, RG-Press Publ., 2021, pp. 238–246. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Semeeva, S. A. “Vzgliad L. N. Tolstogo na reshenie agrarnogo voprosa v Rossii nachala XX v.” [“L. N. Tolstoy’s View on the Resolution of the Agrarian Question in Russia in the Early 20th Century”]. Problemy agrarnoi istorii Rossii [Problems of Agrarian History of Russia]. Lipetsk, Lipetsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2021, pp. 103–108. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sidorovnin, G. P. “Lev Tolstoi protiv Petra Stolypina: spor o zemle” [“Leo Tolstoy vs. Pyotr Stolypin: The Land Dispute”]. Gumanitarii: aktualnye problemy gumanitarnoi nauki i obrazovaniia, no. 4 (36), 2016, pp. 72–78. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Smirnov, S. N. “K voprosu o pravovykh i ekonomicheskikh posledstviiakh preobrazovanii agrarnoi sfery Rossii v gody reform P. A. Stolypina (1906–1911)” [“On the Legal and Economic Consequences of Transformations in the Agrarian Sphere of Russia during the Years of P. A. Stolypin’s Reforms (1906–1911)”]. Agrarnoe i zemelnoe pravo, no. 5 (173), 2019, pp. 37–40. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Khristenko, D. N. “Russkie klassiki i sud’ba Rossii v proizvedeniiakh amerikanskogo pisatelia Morisa Khindusa” [“Russian Classics and the Fate of Russia in the Works of the American Writer Maurice Hindus”]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025, pp. 240–257. https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-2-240-257 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Iur’ev, V. M. “Osobyi put’ resheniia agrarnogo voprosa v Rossii (k 90-letiiu stolypinskoi reformy)” [“A Special Way to Resolve the Agrarian Question in Russia (On the 90th Anniversary of the Stolypin Reform)”]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 3 (7), 1997, p. 25–45. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
