Download:

PDF

Keywords: Gogol, L. Tolstoy, epic, epic novel, creative exploration, continuity, artistic resemblance, sermon, religious search, popular position.
For citation:

Andreeva, V. G. “N. V. Gogol and L. N. Tolstoy: the Continuity of the Epic Tradition.” Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, pp. 118–165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2022-4-1-118-165 

Author: Valeria G. Andreeva
Information about the author:

Valeria G. Andreeva, DSc in Philology, Leading Research Fellow, A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya 25 a, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-3153 

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Received: November 28, 2021
Approved after reviewing: February 18, 2022
Published: April 05, 2022
Issue: 2022 Volume 4 No. 1
Department: Russian Literature of the 18th–19th Centuries
Pages: 118–165
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2022-4-1-118-165
UDK: 821.161.1.09"19"

Acknowledgments:

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), number 20-012-00102.

Abstract:

The article raises the issue of L. N. Tolstoy’s creative assimilation of the themes, discoveries and artistic images of N. V. Gogol. Referring mainly to the late period of the writers’ work, the author indicates the parallelism of their path. Tolstoy felt the similarity of philosophical and artistic complexities that confronted him and his predecessor, at a certain moment he admitted that he was following Gogol, “our Pascal.” It is noted that Tolstoy’s great interest in “Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends” in the late 1880s forced him to rethink Gogol’s work, and turn to the poem “Dead Souls” to find a harmonious pairing of denunciation of modern vices with the thought of the timeliness of repentance and the joy of the coming Resurrection. The article makes a significant comparison of the landlords from Gogol’s poem “Dead Souls” and the officials from Tolstoy’s novel “Resurrection,” it is noted that against the background of the general satirical manner of narration in the poem and the epic novel, the writers turned to the difficult conditions for the survival of the Russian people, from the position of which everything that happens in their artistic worlds is estimated.

 

References

Andreeva, V. G. O natsional’nom svoeobrazii russkogo romana vtoroi poloviny XIX veka [On the National Identity of the Russian Novel of the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Kostroma, KGU Publ,, 2016. 492 p. (In Russ.)

Andreeva, V. G. “Obraz zemli i ego funktsii v romane L. N. Tolstogo ʽVoskresenie’.” [“The Image of the Land and Its Functions in Tolstoy’s Novel ʽResurrection’.”]. Studia Litterarum, vol. 5, no. 3, 2020, pp. 236–251. https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2020-5-3-236-251 (In Russ.)

Bocharov, S. G. “Dva ukhoda: Gogol’, Tolstoi” [“Two Departures: Gogol, Tolstoy”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 1, 2011, pp. 9–35. (In Russ.)

Vinogradov, I. A. “Literaturnaia propoved’ N. V. Gogolia: pro et contra” [“Literary Preaching of N. V. Gogol: Pro et Contra”]. Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki, vol. 16, no. 2, 2018a, pp. 49–124. (In Russ.)

Vinogradov, I. A. “Slavianofil’stvo i zapadnichestvo v spore o poeme N. V. Gogolia ‘Mertvye dushi’: nevostrebovannoe i zabytoe” [“Slavophilism v. Westernism in the Dispute About Nikolai Gogol’s Novel ‘Dead Souls’: Unclaimed and Forgotten”]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 2, no. 1, 2020, pp. 62–153. https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2020-2-1-62-153 (In Russ.)

Vinogradov, I. A. Strasti po Gogoliu. O dukhovnom nasledii pisatelia [Gogol Passion. On the Writer’s Spiritual Heritage]. Moscow, Veche Publ., 2018b. 320 p. (In Russ.)

Voropaev, V. A. “ʽPokoinika vstretit’ — k schast’iu’. Narodnye primety v poeme N. V. Gogolia ʽMertvye dushi’.” [“ʽTo Meet a Dead is Fortunate”. Folk Omens in N. V. Gogol’s Poem ‘Dead Souls’.”]. Russkaia rech’, no. 2, 2008, pp. 114–117. (In Russ.)

Gol’denberg, A. Kh. “Gogol’ i Dante kak sovremennaia nauchnaia problema” [“Gogol and Dante as a Modern Scientific Problem”]. N. V. Gogol’ i sovremennaia kul’tura: materialy dokladov i soobshchenii Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Shestye Gogolevskie chteniia [N. V. Gogol and Modern Culture: Materials of Reports and Messages of the International Scientific Conference, Sixth Gogol Proceedings]. Moscow. Universitet Publ., 2007. Available at: http://old.domgogolya.ru/storage/documents/readings/06/goldenberg_a_h_-_gogol_i_dante_kak_sovremennya_nauchnaya_problema.pdf (Accessed 10 November 2021) (In Russ.)

Griffits, F. K., Rabinovich, S. Dzh. Tretii Rim. Klassicheskii epos i russkii roman (ot Gogolia do Pasternaka) [The Third Rome. Classical Epic and Russian Novel (from Gogol to Pasternak)], trans. from English by E. G. Rabinovich. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbakha Publ., 2005. 336 p. (In Russ.)

Gudzii, N. K. “Istoriia pisaniia i pechataniia ʽVoskreseniia’.” [“The Creative and Publishing History of ʽResurrection’.”]. Tolstoi, L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90 t. [Complete Works: in 90 vols.], vol. 33. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1935, pp. 329–422. (In Russ.)

Zverev, A. M., Tunimanov, V. A. Lev Tolstoi [Leo Tolstoy]. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Puibl., 2007. 782 p. (In Russ.)

Zolotusskii, I. P. “Tolstoi chitaet ʽVybrannye mesta iz perepiski s druz’iami’.” [“Tolstoy Reads ʽSelected Passages from Correspondence with Friends’.”]. Literatura, no. 32, 2003. Available at: https://lit.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200303204 (Accessed: 10 November 2021) (In Russ.)

Kupreianova, E. N. Estetika L. N. Tolstogo [Aesthetics of L. N. Tolstoy]. Moscow, Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1966. 324 p. (In Russ.)

Lebedev, Iu. V. “Lev Tolstoi i ʽtolstovstvo’.” [Lev Tolstoy and ʽTolstoyism’.”] Neutomimye stranniki: sbornik nauchnykh statei k 80-letnemu iubileiu doktorov filologicheskikh nauk, professorov Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Iu. V. Lebedeva i V. V. Tikhomirova [Tireless Wanderers: a Collection of Scientific Articles Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Doctors of Philological Sciences, Professors of Kostroma State University Yu. V. Lebedev and V. V. Tikhomirov]. Kostroma, Kostromskoi gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., 2020, pp. 39–50. (In Russ.)

Lomunov, K. N. Nad stranitsami “Voskreseniia” [Reading “Resurrection”]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1978. 381 p. (In Russ.)

Mann, Iu. V. Poetika Gogolia. Variatsii k teme [Gogol’s Poetics. Variations on a Theme]. Moscow, Coda Publ., 1996. 474 p. (In Russ.)

Mikhnovets. N.G. “Roman L. N. Tolstogo kak epicheskii: avtorskii podkhod k izobrazheniiu faktov sovremennosti i ikh otsenka” [“The Novel “Resurrection’ by Leo Tolstoy as an Epic: the Author’s Approach to the Image of Facts of Contemporaneity and Their Appraisal”]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, vol. 26, no. 2, 2020, pp. 132–138. https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2020-26-2-132-138 (In Russ.)

Nikiforov, A. I. “ʽO Gogole’. Kommentarii” [“ʽAbout Gogol’. Comments”]. Tolstoi, L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90 t. [Complete Works: in 90 vols.], vol. 26. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1936, pp. 874–877. (In Russ.)

Opul’skaia, L. D. Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoi: Materialy k biografii s 1886 po 1892 g. [Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy: Materials for a Biography from 1886 to 1892]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 287 p. (In Russ.)

Opul’skaia, L. D. Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoi. Materialy k biografii s 1892 po 1899 [Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy. Materials for a Biography from 1892 to 1899]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1998. 405 p. (In Russ.)

Fridlender, G. M. “Ot ʽMertvykh dush’ k ʽBrat’iam Karamazovym’.” [“From ʽDead Souls’ to ʽThe Brothers Karamazov’.”]. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia [Dostoevsky. Materials and Research], vol. 13. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1996. pp. 16–22. (In Russ.)

Shtab, V. A. “Esteticheskaia pozitsiia N. V. Gogolia v retseptsii L. N. Tolstogo” [“N. V. Gogol’s Aesthetic Position in L. N. Tolstoy’s Reception”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 382, 2014, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)