Keywords: reception of “rehash”, dialogues of artistic worlds, worldview convergence, ideological confrontation, separatism, state integrity, nihilism, “lower classes” and “upper classes” of society.
For citation:

Lebedev, Yu. V. “At the Origins of the Dialogue of Epic Novels in the Journal Russian Bulletin (I. S. Turgenev and B. M. Markevich).” Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 3, no. 3, 2021, pp. 22–51. (In Russ.) 

Author: Yuriy V. Lebedev
Information about the author:

Yuriy V. Lebedev, DSc in Philology, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Kostroma State University, Dzerzhinsky St. 17, 156005 Kostroma, Russia.

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Received: April 26, 2021
Approved after reviewing: July 19, 2021
Published: September 30, 2021
Issue: 2021 Volume 3 No. 3
Department: Russian Literature of the 18th–19th Centuries
Pages: 22-51
UDK: 821.161.1.0

Acknowledgments: The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 20-012-00102.

Abstract: The article examines the emergence of personal and then creative ties between I. S. Turgenev and B. M. Markevich. It is proved that the novels of Markevich and other members of the “constellation of Moscow writers”, employees of the Russian Bulletin, were created with an attitude towards artistic polemic. The article examines connections and confrontations in the worldview of Turgenev and Markevich, who shared the ideological guidelines of the editor of the “Russian Bulletin” M. N. Katkov. Markevich advocated the state integrity of the country, in addition to Turgenev’s “nihilists” and “superfluous people”, he chose patriotic nobles as literary heroes. In the novel Types of the Past, published in the Russian Bulletin four months after the publication of the novel Smoke, Markevich contrasted Irina and Litvinov with “a virtuous matron” and “exemplary citizens”. Markevich argues with Turgenev’s cult of love as a spontaneous passion, defending Orthodox Christian values. Turgenev’s response to this novel is lost, but Markevich’s reply letter shows that Turgenev subjected him to severe criticism. In the novel Virgin Soil in the person of Nezhdanov, Turgenev gave a polemical answer to Markevich, resolving this conflict in his own way in favor of the hero’s political convictions.


Andreeva, V. G. O natsional’nom svoeobrazii russkogo romana vtoroi poloviny XIX veka [On the National Identity of the Russian Novel of the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Kostroma, KGU Publ., 2016. 492 p. (In Russ.)

Gaintseva, E. G. “I. S. Turgenev i ‘molodaia pleiada’ pisatelei ‘Russkogo vestnika’ 1870 – nachala 1880-kh godov” [“I. S. Turgenev and the ‘young constellation’ of Writers of the ‘Russian Bulletin’ of 1870 – early 1880s”]. I. S. Turgenev. Voprosy biografii i tvorchestva [I. S. Turgenev. Issuues of Biography and Creativity]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1990, pp. 122–150. (In Russ.)

Golovin, K. F. Russkii roman i russkoe obshchestvo [Russian Novel and Russian Society]. St. Petersburg, Izdanie A. F. Marksa Publ., 1897. 472 p. (In Russ.)

Nevedenskii, S. Katkov i ego vremia [Katkov and His Time]. St. Petersburg, Tipografiia S. Suvorina Publ., 1888. 570 p. (In Russ.)

Nike, Mishel’. “Iz neizdannykh pisem A. K. Tolstogo k B. M. Markevichu” [“From Unpublished Letters of A. K. Tolstoy to B. M. Markevich”]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’nye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biologicheskie nauki, vol. 18, no. 1 (2), 2016, pp. 223–226. (In Russ.)

Fedorov, A. V. Aleksei Konstantinovich Tolstoi i russkaia literatura ego vremeni [Alexey Konstantinovich Tolstoy and Russian Literature of His Time]. Moscow, Russkoe slovo Publ., 2017. 752 p. (In Russ.)